rammimages.com updates
Source details
Source Status
Web archive
Interviewer
Minxfic
Research Notes
Many critical statements in August from rammimages.com disclosing partial legal documentation received that reveals improperly worded legal threats and unclear communication of what was being asked or disputed for removal. Including complaints of blindsiding the site owner with legal papers without prior contact or simple requests via email that echoes rammsteinfan.de's situation.
Oh and if you read, you'll see an "example" was Keine Lust making of screenshots. But that was just ONE example. The wording clearly insinuates more than this was being disputed. And they also named every band member and it wasn't limited to just one person, one making of video, or one photographer instance. They are asking Minx to remove all images of the full band and yet also telling her they aren't asking her to close her site. They are being honest they aren't taking her domain or asking her to never run a site at all. But they are removing the entire purpose/function of her site that keeping it open is pointless, as she said.
This phrase from rammstein.com: "If the domain host uses the occasion to close the site, we can only (like any others) wonder." is utterly disrespectful and obtuse. They told her to remove images and it's a site about images.
The claim they had previously contacted her were also rebuttal against on the 29th as false. As she stated, the rammstein.com statement is trying to insinuate Minx is lying or exaggerating. They falsely disparage her regarding shirts and try to paint her as intentionally a bad faith actor. It's unprofessional in every regard.
Oh and if you read, you'll see an "example" was Keine Lust making of screenshots. But that was just ONE example. The wording clearly insinuates more than this was being disputed. And they also named every band member and it wasn't limited to just one person, one making of video, or one photographer instance. They are asking Minx to remove all images of the full band and yet also telling her they aren't asking her to close her site. They are being honest they aren't taking her domain or asking her to never run a site at all. But they are removing the entire purpose/function of her site that keeping it open is pointless, as she said.
This phrase from rammstein.com: "If the domain host uses the occasion to close the site, we can only (like any others) wonder." is utterly disrespectful and obtuse. They told her to remove images and it's a site about images.
The claim they had previously contacted her were also rebuttal against on the 29th as false. As she stated, the rammstein.com statement is trying to insinuate Minx is lying or exaggerating. They falsely disparage her regarding shirts and try to paint her as intentionally a bad faith actor. It's unprofessional in every regard.
Catalog details
Date
2005.08
Language
English